Domus web site authors answer a police investigation Mortem
July 5, 2011
The
Brazilian website, with a video of a cat in a cage offered visitors the
option to choose the fate of the animal to kill him or save him, is
accused of condoning violence to animals.
In response to an article published by ANDA,
police in Sao Paulo at the request of prosecutors, police opened an
investigation No. 287/11 in Precinct 1 of Environment of Saint Paul to
determine the incitement to violence against animals Suggested
domusmortem.com website. The legal action had been the state representative Fernando headers (PSDB / SP).
The site featured a video of a cat in a cage and gave
visitors the option to choose the fate of the animal to kill or save the
cat. The exhibition has caused controversy for its content
disturbing and attracted hundreds of thousands of visitors, all very
concerned about the fate of the animal. Internet users in
Spain, Britain, Germany, Brazil, among others, were mobilized social
networks to denounce the website, which was, according to its authors,
about a million hits in just 10 days and been shot down three times by
hackers.
Well Josmar Junior, 38, film technicians, is the
executive producer and partner-Mortem Domus direct producer Hella Film
Productions. In an interview with the ANDA, said: "The idea
was to entertain the public within a proposal for a fictional drama
without a defined format. The site is actually the product, but still do
not know where to go. After this impact is likely to try to sell
something based on this production, "he said proudly. The strategy used to increase the audience and the public access, however, unethical and any conscious and artistic value. According to the DA ANDA, professor and columnist, Take
Laertes, the website has exceeded "the scope of freedom of speech to
enter the harvest of crime. After all, keeping a caged animal under the
threat of death if this is the will of the majority, means that criminal
responsibility falls on those who are promoting this kind of "deadly
game," he said. Little worried about the legal consequences of the case,
Josmar said he had no intent to incite ill-treatment of animals, but to
discuss the violence as a villain would Domus Mortem.
Suffering
Despite all the excuses you may have, the video has caused suffering for the animal. The
cat used in the experiment was imprisoned in a cage for more than eight
hours, according to production for the video was recorded. The images were presented in a cycle that lasts eight hours to create the illusion of a live scene in real time. The intention was to keep the site for a month, but due
to overflow the cat was removed and replaced by a scene of a woman tied
to a chair.
The vision of justice
The prosecutor cites Article 225 par. 1,
section VII, which prohibits the display of cruelty to animals, Article
32 of Law 9.605/09 Environmental Crimes, which prohibits the use of
ill-treatment or abuse of animals, and the Penal Code, which punishes
those who publicly incite crime practice (Article 286), or make apology
for a crime (Article 87), the penalty ranges from three to six months
imprisonment or a fine.
The prosecutor added that "the mere dissemination of
these things online, such as leaving the cat's fate in the hands of the
public, violated ethical principles. No advertising can be enforced
illegal means to promote anything. No one can invoke the constitutional
right of expression in violation of other constitutional rights, in this
case the law that animals are not subjected to cruelty. Not to mention
that such a proposal is perverse, a stimulus for other sadistic actions
at the expense of animals, knowing that the Internet is a world without
limits guarantees often anonymity and impunity, "said Toma. He also said that "we can not accept abuse as normal, as
well as violating the rights of animals, they also face society in
general, is already tired of all apology for violence."
For the lawyer, founder of the Association of
animal lawyers and collaborator of ANDA, Carlos Cipro, in addition to
criminal consequences, there are other aspects of the civilian
population: "The environmental damage caused by global crime display
practiced, or threat thereof, goes beyond the mere result of the act
itself, leading to outrage many people, misinforming the population,
with significant social impact. So said the obvious collective moral
damage, the agent must compensate to society, "he explains.
I rallied to save this dog he's talking about because I was outraged about this myself:
Editor's Note (ANDA) in the name of an art course and committed many crimes. In
2007, Guillermo Vargas Habacuc Costarricense, previously considered an
"artist" actually proved to be a murderer to exhibit at a gallery of his
country, a dog tied to die slowly of hunger and thirst. Agony that lasted several days and looked passively by the public. The aim was to show the artist's human hypocrisy. This is an example of abuse by consent laws that ignore ethics, respect, dignity and the right to life of all animals. The artist can not be above the law. The
reaction against exploitation and a just and egalitarian ethic among
all beings is the way to not only the evolution of culture and art, but
the coexistence of humans and other species. Source: www.anda.jor.br
To read more: http://www.animalurbano.org/noticias.php?id=67